0.07/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IgXNnoshAs true 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 960 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 02:35:05 EDT 2022 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.35 % Running portfolio for 960 s 0.12/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.12/0.35 % Number of cores: 8 0.12/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.12/0.35 % Running in HO mode 0.56/0.67 % Total configuration time : 828 0.56/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1656 0.56/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0 0.57/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s 0.57/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s 0.57/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s 0.57/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s 0.57/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s 0.57/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s 0.57/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s 0.58/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s 71.38/9.65 % Solved by lams/40_c_ic.sh. 71.38/9.65 % done 482 iterations in 8.879s 71.38/9.65 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 71.38/9.65 % SZS output start Refutation 71.38/9.65 thf(a_type, type, a: $tType). 71.38/9.65 thf(sk__type, type, sk_: a). 71.38/9.65 thf(sk__1_type, type, sk__1: (a > $o) > (a > $o) > a). 71.38/9.65 thf(cK_type, type, cK: (a > $o) > a > $o). 71.38/9.65 thf(cTHM116_1SS, conjecture, 71.38/9.65 (( ![X:( a > $o ),Y:( a > $o )]: 71.38/9.65 ( ( ![Xx:a]: ( ( X @ Xx ) => ( Y @ Xx ) ) ) => 71.38/9.65 ( ![Xx:a]: ( ( cK @ X @ Xx ) => ( cK @ Y @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) => 71.38/9.65 ( ![Xx:a]: 71.38/9.65 ( ( cK @ 71.38/9.65 ( ^[Xx0:a]: 71.38/9.65 ( ?[S:( a > $o )]: 71.38/9.65 ( ( S @ Xx0 ) & 71.38/9.65 ( ![Xx1:a]: ( ( S @ Xx1 ) => ( cK @ S @ Xx1 ) ) ) ) ) ) @ 71.38/9.65 Xx ) => 71.38/9.65 ( cK @ 71.38/9.65 ( cK @ 71.38/9.65 ( ^[Xx0:a]: 71.38/9.65 ( ?[S:( a > $o )]: 71.38/9.65 ( ( S @ Xx0 ) & 71.38/9.65 ( ![Xx1:a]: ( ( S @ Xx1 ) => ( cK @ S @ Xx1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) @ 71.38/9.65 Xx ) ) ))). 71.38/9.65 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, 71.38/9.65 (~( ( ![X:( a > $o ),Y:( a > $o )]: 71.38/9.65 ( ( ![Xx:a]: ( ( X @ Xx ) => ( Y @ Xx ) ) ) => 71.38/9.65 ( ![Xx:a]: ( ( cK @ X @ Xx ) => ( cK @ Y @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) => 71.38/9.65 ( ![Xx:a]: 71.38/9.65 ( ( cK @ 71.38/9.65 ( ^[Xx0:a]: 71.38/9.65 ( ?[S:( a > $o )]: 71.38/9.65 ( ( S @ Xx0 ) & 71.38/9.65 ( ![Xx1:a]: ( ( S @ Xx1 ) => ( cK @ S @ Xx1 ) ) ) ) ) ) @ 71.38/9.65 Xx ) => 71.38/9.65 ( cK @ 71.38/9.65 ( cK @ 71.38/9.65 ( ^[Xx0:a]: 71.38/9.65 ( ?[S:( a > $o )]: 71.38/9.65 ( ( S @ Xx0 ) & 71.38/9.65 ( ![Xx1:a]: ( ( S @ Xx1 ) => ( cK @ S @ Xx1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) @ 71.38/9.65 Xx ) ) ) )), 71.38/9.65 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cTHM116_1SS])). 71.38/9.65 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, 71.38/9.65 (~ (cK @ 71.38/9.65 (cK @ 71.38/9.65 (^[Y0 : a]: 71.38/9.65 (((??) @ (^[Y1 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 (((Y1 @ Y0) & 71.38/9.65 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : a]: 71.38/9.65 (((Y1 @ Y2) => (cK @ Y1 @ Y2))))))))))))) @ 71.38/9.65 sk_)), 71.38/9.65 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 71.38/9.65 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, 71.38/9.65 ( (cK @ 71.38/9.65 (^[Y0 : a]: 71.38/9.65 (((??) @ (^[Y1 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 (((Y1 @ Y0) & 71.38/9.65 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : a]: (((Y1 @ Y2) => (cK @ Y1 @ Y2)))))))))))) @ 71.38/9.65 sk_)), 71.38/9.65 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 71.38/9.65 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, 71.38/9.65 ( (cK @ 71.38/9.65 (^[Y0 : a]: 71.38/9.65 (((??) @ (^[Y1 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 (((Y1 @ Y0) & 71.38/9.65 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : a]: (((Y1 @ Y2) => (cK @ Y1 @ Y2)))))))))))) @ 71.38/9.65 sk_)), 71.38/9.65 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 71.38/9.65 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, 71.38/9.65 (![X0 : a > $o, X1 : a, X2 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 (~ (cK @ X0 @ X1) | (cK @ X2 @ X1) | ~ (X2 @ (sk__1 @ X2 @ X0)))), 71.38/9.65 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 71.38/9.65 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain, 71.38/9.65 (![X0 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 (~ (X0 @ 71.38/9.65 (sk__1 @ X0 @ 71.38/9.65 (^[Y0 : a]: 71.38/9.65 (((??) @ (^[Y1 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 (((Y1 @ Y0) & 71.38/9.65 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : a]: 71.38/9.65 (((Y1 @ Y2) => (cK @ Y1 @ Y2)))))))))))))) 71.38/9.65 | (cK @ X0 @ sk_))), 71.38/9.65 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl1])). 71.38/9.65 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 71.38/9.65 (![X0 : a > $o, X1 : a, X2 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 (~ (cK @ X0 @ X1) | (cK @ X2 @ X1) | (X0 @ (sk__1 @ X2 @ X0)))), 71.38/9.65 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 71.38/9.65 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, 71.38/9.65 (~ (cK @ 71.38/9.65 (cK @ 71.38/9.65 (^[Y0 : a]: 71.38/9.65 (((??) @ (^[Y1 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 (((Y1 @ Y0) & 71.38/9.65 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : a]: 71.38/9.65 (((Y1 @ Y2) => (cK @ Y1 @ Y2))))))))))))) @ 71.38/9.65 sk_)), 71.38/9.65 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 71.38/9.65 thf(zip_derived_cl280, plain, 71.38/9.65 (![X0 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 ( (X0 @ 71.38/9.65 (sk__1 @ 71.38/9.65 (cK @ 71.38/9.65 (^[Y0 : a]: 71.38/9.65 (((??) @ (^[Y1 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 (((Y1 @ Y0) & 71.38/9.65 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : a]: 71.38/9.65 (((Y1 @ Y2) => (cK @ Y1 @ Y2))))))))))))) @ 71.38/9.65 X0)) 71.38/9.65 | ~ (cK @ X0 @ sk_))), 71.38/9.65 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2])). 71.38/9.65 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, 71.38/9.65 (![X0 : a > $o, X1 : a, X2 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 (~ (cK @ X0 @ X1) | (cK @ X2 @ X1) | ~ (X2 @ (sk__1 @ X2 @ X0)))), 71.38/9.65 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 71.38/9.65 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 71.38/9.65 (![X0 : a > $o, X1 : a, X2 : a > $o]: 71.38/9.65 (~ (cK @ X0 @ X1) | (cK @ X2 @ X1) | (X0 @ (sk__1 @ X2 @ X0)))), 71.38/9.65 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 71.38/9.65 thf(zip_derived_cl7255, plain, ($false), 71.38/9.65 inference('eprover', [status(thm)], 71.38/9.65 [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl33, 71.38/9.65 zip_derived_cl280, zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])). 71.38/9.65 71.38/9.65 % SZS output end Refutation 71.38/9.65 71.38/9.65 71.38/9.65 % Terminating... 71.65/9.70 % Runner terminated. 71.65/9.71 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 71.65/9.72 EOF